2 min read

2016 Election - Tax Positions Compared

May 10, 2016 — Not surprisingly, the tax positions of our presidential candidates differ dramatically, and that is especially true between the parties. Some of the changes proposed by the candidates could significantly alter the current tax system.

The Tax Foundation, a not-for-profit independent tax policy research organization, recently published a study comparing the candidates’ tax policies and the economic impact of the proposals.  A few of the proposals are listed below.

Clinton Proposals

  • Surcharge of 4% to the tax rate for high income taxpayers (over $5 million).
  • Enact the "Buffet Rule" which puts a minimum tax in place for taxpayers with adjusted gross income over $1 million.
  • Redefine long-term capital gains to more than 6 years with varying rates for less than 6 years
  • Enacts a tax on high-frequency trading

Sanders Proposals

  • Adds four new tax brackets with a top rate of 52% and taxes capital gains rate at ordinary rates if household income exceeds $250,000
  • Caps itemized deductions at a 28% rate if household income exceeds $250,000
  • Eliminates the alternative minimum tax, the personal exemption phase out and the Pease Limitation on itemized deductions
  • Creates a new 2.2% income based "health care" premium paid by households as well as creating an additional 6.2% employer side payroll tax and a new 0.2% employer/employee payroll tax.
  • Applies the social security payroll tax to earnings over $250,000
  • Eliminates deferral of income from controlled foreign subsidiaries
  • Limit like-kind exchanges of property to $1 million per taxpayer per year and prohibit the use of like-kind exchanges for art and collectibles.

Trump Proposals

  • Consolidates seven brackets into four brackets with rates of 0%, 10%, 20% and 25%
  • Increases the standard deduction to $25,000 ($50,000 for married filing joint)
  • "Steepening the curve" on the personal exemption and Pease limitation phase-out’s
  • Eliminates the alternative minimum tax, the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax, and the estate tax systems
  • Reduce the corporate income tax rate to 15% and cap the rate of tax on flow-through business income to 15%.
  • Eliminates deferral of income from controlled foreign subsidiaries
  • Enacts a one-time deemed repatriation tax of 10% on all currently deferred foreign profits

Tax policy appears to be a key issue in the presidential election discussion. The positions listed here are based upon the initial plan laid out by the candidates but will likely change and be refined over the course of the election.  Given the push from all candidates to reform the tax laws, it will be important to research the candidates’ positions and understand the implications as you head to the polls.

To access the full publication including an estimate of the economic impact from the Tax Foundation click here.

Does Software Development Count as a Research and Development Tax Credit?

Does Software Development Count as a Research and Development Tax Credit?

Research and development (R&D) is so vital to U.S. economic growth that the government offers aspecific tax creditto encourage it. Any company that...

Read More
Tax Policy Planning in Construction and Real Estate: Advice from Redpath’s CRE Lead

Tax Policy Planning in Construction and Real Estate: Advice from Redpath’s CRE Lead

With a new administration in place, the next few years may bring significant policy considerations for construction and real estate businesses. As...

Read More
Navigating Multi-State Sales Tax: A Strategic Approach

Navigating Multi-State Sales Tax: A Strategic Approach

Many businesses discover their sales tax obligations only after receiving an audit notice. As director of state and local tax services at Redpath, I...

Read More